bacil
Member
This is just the generic question.
I am reading all the comments and posts here, and it occurred to me that I am probably only one / or defo one of the small group who hosts their websites on my own. So to share my experience I decided on this write-up.
First of all, I host my websites on AWS, which provides me with the ability to build and test website ideas quite fast at NO hosting cost. As every domain (email) I can register for free tier in AWS and have one year of the cloud for free. So my usual setup is
1. EC2 with Apache, PHP fpm
2. RDS for database
3. S3 or Elastic storage for images
4. CloudFront for the CDN services
This setup has several benefits, one of them is that it's FREE and when the site starts making money it can easily be upgraded when/if needed. Also, it being coud served I have the ability to failover somewhere else. there are no network outages or hardware failures and apart from me totally screwing up config I am running 99.999% uptime on all my aws hosted sites.
So what do you think, is that good or would you still stick to old hosting model?
I am reading all the comments and posts here, and it occurred to me that I am probably only one / or defo one of the small group who hosts their websites on my own. So to share my experience I decided on this write-up.
First of all, I host my websites on AWS, which provides me with the ability to build and test website ideas quite fast at NO hosting cost. As every domain (email) I can register for free tier in AWS and have one year of the cloud for free. So my usual setup is
1. EC2 with Apache, PHP fpm
2. RDS for database
3. S3 or Elastic storage for images
4. CloudFront for the CDN services
This setup has several benefits, one of them is that it's FREE and when the site starts making money it can easily be upgraded when/if needed. Also, it being coud served I have the ability to failover somewhere else. there are no network outages or hardware failures and apart from me totally screwing up config I am running 99.999% uptime on all my aws hosted sites.
So what do you think, is that good or would you still stick to old hosting model?